Field service software comparison

FieldN vs Fieldproxy: jobs-based platform or a complete suite for India and the Gulf?

By Yoonus C, founder of Mycodlabs Technologies (makers of FieldN)  ·  Facts checked  ·  5 min read

Quick answer

Fieldproxy is a field service platform sold by jobs per month — Starter 100, Core 300, Growth 750, Scale 1,500 — with unlimited users, a one-time setup fee, 25% off yearly, and no price printed. FieldN is the better pick if you want a customer booking app, AMC contracts with planned visits, inventory, double-entry accounting, HR and payroll, a WhatsApp assistant and Saudi ZATCA or UAE e-invoicing in one suite, priced for your team after a demo.

Side-by-side comparison

Feature FieldN Fieldproxy
Price Free demo; price quoted for your team size and the modules you need No price shown; plans by jobs per month (Starter 100, Core 300, Growth 750, Scale 1,500, Custom 2,000+); one-time setup fee; 25% off yearly; no refunds
Users Priced for your team Unlimited users on every plan
Apps Web back office, technician app for Android and iPhone, customer booking portal and app Web, iOS and Android; technician app set up as part of the setup fee
Customer booking Your own online booking portal and customer app, in your brand Not mentioned on pricing page
Dispatch Smart dispatch ranks technicians by skill, distance, workload, rating and the customer's preferred technician Dispatching and scheduling product page; not listed on pricing page
GPS tracking Live GPS map of technicians; customers get "technician on the way" updates Not mentioned on pricing page
Contracts / AMC AMC and service contracts with planned visits, renewal reminders and contract invoices Not mentioned; recurring visits count as jobs
Inventory Parts and stock across warehouses, purchase orders, parts used per job Not mentioned on pricing page
Forms and job cards Checklists, inspection forms, photos, customer signature and PDF job cards Unlimited automations and all AI features on every plan
Accounting Double-entry books: trial balance, profit and loss, balance sheet, general ledger and a VAT/GST tax summary QuickBooks and Xero sync as integrations (1 to 10 integrations by plan)
HR and payroll HR built in: attendance, leave, payroll, timesheets and commissions Not mentioned on pricing page
WhatsApp WhatsApp Business messages and a WhatsApp assistant for job status, quotes, complaints and payments Not mentioned; SMS and calling count as integrations
AI AI dispatch, "ask your data" reports and AI checklists; bring your own Claude, OpenAI, Gemini or AWS Bedrock key AI credits per month: 500, 1,000, 2,500, 5,000 by plan; API and MCP server on every plan
Saudi & UAE e-invoicing Saudi ZATCA Phase 2 (B2B cleared, B2C reported) and UAE e-invoicing (PINT AE through your ASP) built in Not mentioned on pricing page
Countries Any country — your own currency and tax rates Not stated on pricing page

Prices and features change often. We checked them on 1 November 2026 from each vendor's own website — please check the vendor's site before you buy. We make FieldN, so we have tried to be fair and say where the other product is the better pick.

Price: jobs per month vs a quote for your team

Fieldproxy counts jobs, not people: Starter 100 jobs a month, Core 300, Growth 750, Scale 1,500, with unlimited users, a one-time setup fee and 25% off when paid yearly. The price itself is not on the page — you book a demo. A company doing 40 jobs a day is on Scale or Custom. FieldN is also quoted after a demo, for your team size and modules, with no limit on jobs. Ask both and compare the two numbers for your volume.

What a Gulf or Indian service company needs

AMC contracts with planned visits and renewal invoices, a customer app and WhatsApp for bookings and status, parts and stock across warehouses, accounting with a VAT or GST summary, HR with attendance and payroll, and — in Saudi Arabia and the UAE — e-invoicing. FieldN has all of these inside one system. Fieldproxy's pricing page lists automations, AI credits and integrations (QuickBooks, Xero, SMS, calling) and does not mention contracts, inventory, HR, WhatsApp or e-invoicing — ask them what is included.

AI on both sides

Both products lean on AI. Fieldproxy meters AI credits per plan and gives API and MCP access on every plan. FieldN has AI dispatch, "ask your data" reports and an AI checklist assistant, and lets you bring your own Claude, OpenAI, Gemini or AWS Bedrock key so the cost is yours to control.

Which one should you choose?

Choose FieldN if

  • You run AMC or service contracts with planned visits and renewals
  • You want a customer booking app and WhatsApp assistant
  • You want inventory, accounting, HR and payroll in the same system
  • You need Saudi ZATCA or UAE e-invoicing
  • You do many jobs a day and do not want to be priced per job

Choose Fieldproxy if

  • You want unlimited users and a known job volume per month
  • Automations, API and MCP access matter more than contracts and accounting
  • QuickBooks or Xero is your accounting

Frequently asked questions

Is FieldN a good Fieldproxy alternative?

Yes, if you want AMC contracts, a customer booking app, inventory, accounting, HR, WhatsApp and Saudi or UAE e-invoicing in one suite without per-job limits. Fieldproxy suits a team that wants unlimited users, automations and API access for a known monthly job volume.

How much does Fieldproxy cost?

Its pricing page shows no price. Plans are by jobs per month — Starter 100, Core 300, Growth 750, Scale 1,500 — with unlimited users, a one-time setup fee and 25% off yearly; you book a demo for the number.

Does Fieldproxy limit users?

No. Its pricing page says unlimited users on every plan; the limit is jobs per month.

Does FieldN limit jobs per month?

No. FieldN is priced for your team and modules after a demo, with no job limit.

See FieldN with your own services

Book a free demo. We set FieldN up with your services, prices and team, and show the booking app, the technician app and the office side working together.

Book a free demo fieldn@mycodlabs.com See FieldN

More from the FieldN Blog

Sources